Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
2.
Front Immunol ; 13: 1062210, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2198905

ABSTRACT

With the emergence of novel Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) Variants of Concern (VOCs), vaccination studies that elucidate the efficiency and effectiveness of a vaccination campaign are critical to assess the durability and the protective immunity provided by vaccines. SARS-CoV-2 vaccines have been found to induce robust humoral and cell-mediated immunity in individuals vaccinated with homologous vaccination regimens. Recent studies also suggest improved immune response against SARS-CoV-2 when heterologous vaccination strategies are employed. Yet, few data exist on the extent to which heterologous prime-boost-boost vaccinations with two different vaccine platforms have an impact on the T cell-mediated immune responses with a special emphasis on the currently dominantly circulating Omicron strain. In this study, we collected serum and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from 57 study participants of median 35-year old's working in the health care field, who have received different vaccination regimens. Neutralization assays revealed robust but decreased neutralization of Omicron VOC, including BA.1 and BA.4/5, compared to WT SARS-CoV-2 in all vaccine groups and increased WT SARS-CoV-2 binding and neutralizing antibodies titers in homologous mRNA prime-boost-boost study participants. By investigating cytokine production, we found that homologous and heterologous prime-boost-boost-vaccination induces a robust cytokine response of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Collectively, our results indicate robust humoral and T cell mediated immunity against Omicron in homologous and heterologous prime-boost-boost vaccinated study participants, which might serve as a guide for policy decisions.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Vaccines , Humans , Adult , COVID-19 Vaccines , CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes , Antibody Formation , Leukocytes, Mononuclear , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/prevention & control , Cytokines
3.
J Infect Dis ; 226(9): 1608-1615, 2022 11 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1886449

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The contribution of droplet-contaminated surfaces for virus transmission has been discussed controversially in the context of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic. More importantly, the risk of fomite-based transmission has not been systematically addressed. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate whether confirmed hospitalized coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients can contaminate stainless steel carriers by coughing or intensive moistening with saliva and to assess the risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission upon detection of viral loads and infectious virus in cell culture. METHODS: We initiated a single-center observational study including 15 COVID-19 patients with a high baseline viral load (cycle threshold value ≤25). We documented clinical and laboratory parameters and used patient samples to perform virus culture, quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and virus sequencing. RESULTS: Nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs of all patients were positive for viral ribonucleic acid on the day of the study. Infectious SARS-CoV-2 could be isolated from 6 patient swabs (46.2%). After coughing, no infectious virus could be recovered, however, intensive moistening with saliva resulted in successful viral recovery from steel carriers of 5 patients (38.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Transmission of infectious SARS-CoV-2 via fomites is possible upon extensive moistening, but it is unlikely to occur in real-life scenarios and from droplet-contaminated fomites.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Communicable Diseases , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Fomites , Pandemics , Viral Load
4.
Curr Health Sci J ; 47(4): 507-515, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1811367

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic initiated officially in October 2020. Since then several observations have been made regarding the disease and its symptoms. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included eighty seven in our observational study. Our main aim was to investigate their long term respiratory follow-up in correlation with their initial radiological and laboratory findings and values. The nose swab PCR test for COVID-19 was used for diagnosis. Patients were monitored at 3 and 6 months after their hospital reception whereas basic parameters of health condition (smoking, PO2, SPO2, WBC, CXR, CRP, intercurrent findings, days of nursing, colchicine administration) in joint with gender and age were recorded. RESULTS: Males seem more susceptible to the viral disease than females in a ratio 1,8:1. The parameters FEV1 and FVC (as % relative changes) were not affected, apart from the DLCO to which CRP (in loge+1 transformation) and SPO2 showed a statistically significant effect. CONCLUSION: None of these patients were intubated, or admitted to the intensive care unit. The respiratory function is affected by the virus and the effect is reversed within the first three months. Males are more affected and the radiological and laboratory findings are associated with the respiratory functions.

5.
Oncol Res Treat ; 45(3): 112-117, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1495757

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases in Germany, as in most other places in Europe or worldwide, are still highly prevalent. Vaccination rates currently remain low, putting cancer patients at a continued risk of infection with SARS-CoV-2, while prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among cancer patients in Germany remains essentially unknown. METHODS: Between August 2020 and February 2021, patients admitted to our hospital were prospectively enrolled in our COVID-19 biobank. Collected sera were analyzed for SARS-CoV-2-IgM/IgG using Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 assay. RESULTS: One hundred and ten patients with cancer were included in this study. With 71 (65%) patients, most had active cancer treatment, mainly chemotherapy (56%). The most frequent diagnosis was gastrointestinal cancer (54%) with pancreatic cancer being the most common cancer type (24%). Hematologic malignancies were present in 21 patients (17%). Among the cancer patients first diagnosed during the pandemic, the rate of palliative treatment situations tended to be higher (76% vs. 67%, p = 0.17). A history of SARS-CoV-2 infection was documented in 15 (14%) patients; however, SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were detected in 10 (67%) patients only. Of the patients without a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection, none displayed SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. CONCLUSION: In the present single-center experience, a low serological prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among cancer patients even after SARS-CoV-2 infection was found. The results support continued strict preventive measures as well as efforts toward faster vaccination, due to a low immunity level in the population.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Neoplasms , Antibodies, Viral , COVID-19/epidemiology , Humans , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Prevalence , SARS-CoV-2 , Universities
6.
COVID ; 1(1):345-356, 2021.
Article in English | MDPI | ID: covidwho-1390555

ABSTRACT

The role of educational facilities, including schools and universities, in the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic is heavily debated. Specifically, the risk of infection in student dormitories has not been studied. This cohort study monitored students living in dormitories in Bochum, Germany, throughout the winter term of 2020/2021. Over the course of four months, participants were tested repeatedly for SARS-CoV-2 infections using RT-PCR from gargle samples and serological testing. An online questionnaire identified individual risk factors. A total of 810 (46.5% female) students participated. Of these, 590 (72.8%) students participated in the final visit. The cross-sectional antibody prevalence was n = 23 (2.8%) in November 2020 and n = 29 (4.9%) in February 2021. Of 2513 gargle samples analyzed, 19 (0.8%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, corresponding to 14 (2.4%) infections detected within the study period. Gargle samples available of cases with confirmed present infection were always positive. The person-time incidence rate was 112.7 (95% CI: 54.11–207.2) per 100,000 person weeks. The standardized incidence ratio was 0.9 (95% CI 0.51–1.46, p = 0.69). In conclusion, students living in student dormitories do not appear to be major drivers of SARS-CoV-2 infections. RT-PCR from gargle samples is a patient-friendly and scalable surveillance tool for detection of SARS-CoV-2 infections.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL